How do you Teach Creativity?

“The best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas.”

-       Linus Pauling

Linus Pauling, a native of Portland, Oregon, won the Nobel Prize in chemistry in 1954 and the Nobel Peace Prize in 1962. He is one of only two people awarded two Nobel Prizes in different fields, and the only person awarded two unshared prizes. He was also a product of the United States public school system. He attended Washington High School in Portland and later graduated with a degree in chemical engineering. He was a successful chemist, peace activist, author and educator – a 20th century renaissance man – and he did it all because he was able to think outside the box.

According to a recent Newsweek article, the creative thinking skills of American students have steadily declined over the last decade, even as genera intelligence tests show consistent gains. So, we have a generation of smarter kids who lack imagination.

The first standard in NETS for Students is Creativity and Innovation. Specifically, this aspect of the international education standards requires students to:

a.             apply existing knowledge to generate new ideas, products, or processes.

b.             create original works as a means of personal or group expression.

c.             use models and simulations to explore complex systems and issues.

d.             identify trends and forecast possibilities.

But how exactly do you teach creativity? The NETS provide some direction, but this is a quiestion without an easy answer. It’s one thing to hand kids a pack of crayons and tell them to go crazy, but that’s like sitting your average Joe or Jane in the cockpit of a 747 and telling them to go nuts. They can fiddle around and may even fly, but they won’t accomplish nearly as much as they would with proper training and practice.

I think there is an assumption that some kids are just born creative so there’s not need to nurture creative development. It’s like having brown eyes or blue – you’ve either got it or you don’t. Mozart was rumored to compose his symphonies in one sitting with nary a revision. There is a myth that genius just pours from these creative types without preparation. Beethoven filled hundreds of notebooks with musical pieces that were discarded, adjusted, or otherwise redeveloped. One of Benjamin Franklin’s most famous quotes is “I didn’t fail the test, I just found 100 different ways to do it wrong.”

There is no shame in failure. The process of learning is one of continual production, discarding, revision and reworking. Yet our grading and evaluation systems punish failure rather than reward experimentation.  Also, we seem to think that art and music have some sort of special monopoly over creative learning. While I certainly support the arts in schools, creative learning can and should be integrated into all aspects of education.

The Newsweek piece suggests several techniques to boost the creative process. Here are the suggestions, along with my comments on how they can be applied to education.

  • Don’t tell someone to “be creative.” – Kids need some direction to get the creative juices flowing. So, instead of telling students to make something creative, give them a problem and tell them to come up with a solution that their friends would never think of.
  • Reduce screen time – I’m going to change this one to “reduce passive media consumption.” Encourage creativity, undirected fantasy play, and artistic expression. Technology can be a part of this.
  • Get moving – The physically fit experience a boost in cognition after 30 minutes of exercise. It’s not only important to encourage movement in kids, but important to teach kids to maintain at least a moderate level of physical fitness to ensure high-level cognitive function.
  • Follow a passion – Encourage children to find what interests them and pursue it. Kids are at their best when they identify deeply with a field. Superficial well-roundedness can actually cause young people to lose motivation. Instead, expose students to a wide range of ideas, but encourage them to work in groups and differentiate tasks based on skill sets and interests.
  • Ditch the suggestion box – Even kids need to feel that their ideas are actually put into practice. A classroom should be a space for learning, but that doesn’t just mean for the students. Turn the tables and make students the teachers for certain subjects. New technologies can be a great area for students to teach each other or even to teach the instructor.
  • Take a break – If kids are struggling with a task or idea, have them step away from the project for awhile. Forcing students to work on a single subject for a set amount of time can create stagnation if they get stuck or find themselves in a mental block. Also, it’s easy for students to be frustrated if they are engaged in a task then forced to switch gears in the middle of a brainstorm.
  • Explore other cultures – Adam Galinsky, a professor at the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University, found that people who lived abroad outperformed people without international experience on creativity tests. His work also indicates that just studying other cultures can boost creativity scores. So, expand creativity by opening your classroom to the world. By exposing students to other countries and a variety of cultures you expand their view of what is possible.

How do you implement NETS for Students by teaching students to think creatively?

Similar Posts:

adobe acrobat 8 pro instructions Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro Extended download scan using adobe acrobat

9 Comments

The Newsweek article suggestions are good, but kind of a potpourri, and not a systemic approach.

One way to teach creativity is to teach methods, tools and techniques of a 55 year old model for doing so, Creative Problem Solving, or “CPS”. Call it Applied Imagination.

The Creative Education Foundation has for years taught “CPS” (aka the Osborn-Parnes model of Creative Problem Solving) to business people, educators, and youth. Schools at all levels would do well to look at CPS and what CEF does to teach creativity. I believe it provides a flexible, structured, and rich context to teach creativity.

I’m the author of a business novel about CPS, Jack’s Notebook. It provides a great introduction to a true creative system.

See: http://tinyurl.com/382mhux

Marian Royal Vigil

Friday, 23rd July 2010 at 3:49 pm
 

I think ideally teaching creativity should begin in the lower grades. One way to approach this is to absolutely ban canned worksheets that only require students to fill in the blanks. I’ve now seen too many students show up in ninth grade saying “just give me the right answer” when asked to generate solutions to problems. Further, trying to cover too many topics as opposed to covering a few topics in depth, I believe leads to stagnant thinking. If I am racing through material asw quickly as possible so that I can “finish the textbook” or meet all the standards and benchmarks for my grade and subject, there is no way I can be giving students, or myself, for that matter, the necessary time to ruminate on ideas, synthesize material and ultimately create unique solutions. Slowing down, looking deeply into topics and giving students the space and permission to experiment, fail and try again are approaches I want to use in nurturing creativity.

[...] How do you Teach Creativity? | ISTE Connects – Educational Technology [...]

Love this post. I plan to share it with my faculty. It strikes me as profoundly true that for creativity to take place the learning environment has to allow and cultivate appropriate risk taking.

I think we need to move away from the term ‘teach’ and go towards terms such as ‘nuture’ and ‘foster’ when we speak of creating scenarios to enhance the creativity of individuals.

I think one of the reasons creativity is hard to teach, is because it is scary teaching outside the box. Connecting with students in a creative way is not a one size fits all. My own children have learned creativity in very different ways. My daughter’s pasion is music, my son’s is video production. I caught myself at ISTE giving them a hard time about not demonstrating what we were presenting. I realized later that they had taken what they had learned and were already working on the next creative level. As teachers, I think that the expectation of control sometimes interferes with our ability to see that our students are already moving on to the next step. Students need room to grow creatively.

So many thoughtful, relevant comments.
Definitely begin in the lower grades before curiosity goes underground. Give children problems to solve and materials to use rather than worksheets. Ask kids to reflect on their work and thinking, always expecting a because — this is where we as teachers get the true clues to what really went on in the learning experience. Individualize the curriculum. But most importantly I too believe that creativity is not limited to the arts but that ‘creative learning can and should be integrated into the curriculum.’ I would add ‘must’ to that list. Assuming creativity is limited to the arts may be a subtle way to let other subject teachers off the hook. It is in the heart of our classrooms that creativity must find its place.

Is creativity really dissipating, or is it just being translated into different forms? I’m not sure I know the answer to that one, but it’s an interesting question to consider.

I like Nancy’s comment about using different terminology. Being creative seems less like something that one can be taught to do and more like something that one can be inspired to do. Creativity is interwoven with inspiration, and inspiration is primed by what is outside but it occurs inside. It’s more of a terminology thing for me, but I feel an important distinction to make. It’s not enough just to expose children to different cultures, we need to encourage them to think about how that relates to their own culture and lives. We need to encourage them to synthesize and experiment with new ideas.

At the risk of sounding like I live under a rock, this is the first time I’ve read that there is a connection between physical activity and creativity. Of course, after reading this, it makes sense. Sometimes, when I’m in the middle of a task that involves solving a problem(s) (writing a paper, writing lesson plans, painting a picture, etc), I feel the need to step away from my work to take a break. If that break involves some kind of physical activity (going for a walk or even doing chores around the house) I come back to my task with a clearer, more creative/industrious mind than if I had just flopped down on the couch to watch TV.

Interesting stuff!

Leave a Comment

« Back to text comment